Your persevering desire to satisfy our unique requirements, and your never-ending attention to detail has contributed to making me a well-pleased customer of Teleconvergence. Because of your enduring efforts, the public safety needs of Tillamook County will be satisfied for some years to come.
Mark Schackart, Administrator
Tillamook County Emergency Communications District [911]
IT is traditionally responsible for preparing for contingencies or emergencies involving power, networks, file backup, physical access to facilities, etc. Teleconvergence’s Contingency Telecommunications Planning is different in two aspects. First, it addresses not just “normal” or “adverse” conditions, but includes plans for operating under extraordinary circumstances as well. Second, it is pointedly focused on telecommunications continuity, although the form that takes may be dramatically different than day-to-day operations.
Under certain circumstances, clients can also turn such contingency capabilities into revenue generating possibilities, as noted in Turning a Contingency Plan Into a Business Opportunity in the Strategic Telecommunications Marketing (STM) section.
What is the essential nature of an intelligent contingency business continuity plan? Since no one would deliberately create an unintelligent one, any intelligent business continuity plan must have at least two components: a Plan A, which represents normal operations, and a Plan B, which assumes normal operations have been interrupted, if only because NO plan works as planned forever.
Many experienced businesspersons also realize (1) that they can't plan for everything and (2) that they can’t plan for what they haven’t thought of, and so they also create a Plan C solely to maintain critical operations, because whatever affects Plan A might just affect Plan B, too.
Teleconvergence offers two related primary continuity/emergency planning services.
Telecommunications Continuity Planning deals with contingency planning for interruptions in telecommunications services.
Business/Natural Disaster Continuity Planning and Preparedness entails the ability to strategically deploy telecommunications and related technologies to deal with potential as well as unforeseeable and extraordinary emergencies.
Not all disaster and emergency scenarios are the same, although all inevitably prevent the client from operating normally. Simple scenarios involve malfunctions in a client’s system or network. Other scenarios interrupt operations by making the client's premises dangerous or uninhabitable (e.g. gas leak, fire, terrorism). Still others prevent access to the client’s premises (e.g., flooding, ice storm, road closures) so that no one can get to the phones. In either event, what do you do? How to you keep operating?
Teleconvergence's services help clients plan ahead for such contingencies, greatly minimizing possible risk, and certainly costing far less money than it will if they are not anticipated. Not thinking it through beforehand, it seems to us, inevitably puts you at great if not almost unlimited, risk.
Planning like this doesn't take place in a vacuum. It requires awareness of business priorities, operating needs, staffing conditions, budgets, and, of course, technological alternatives, but only if consistent with the foregoing. Technology is not the main consideration, but only a tool to meet business requirements.
If you agree, and you're interested in our aproach, please read the other two articles in this section.
Do these scenarios really apply to your organization, and if so, how ready are you to deal with them? Read the following checklist and make your own determination.
At one time or another, every business owner thinks about what might happen if primary telecommunications facilities were disrupted or become generally unreliable. Many managers who have experienced such events take steps to ensure non-recurrence, such as using backup carriers and networks. Unfortunately, many of these plans turn out to have the same Achilles heel, meaning very little if any additional protection has been obtained.
We've had clients who thought they were adequately protected by having two suppliers. It always makes sense to use multiple suppliers so that if one is performing poorly, traffic can be shifted to another. It's a good, basic Plan B. However, in most buildings, all telecommunications facilities are located in the same area, so if that area is damaged by fire or water, all facilities are equally at risk, and nothing is gained.
Some clients have taken the extra step of running separate feeds from different suppliers into different parts of a building. This affords greater protection, but it's also happened that some distance off, the separate feeds had the same route to the client – and a backhoe pulled up the cable(s) before the feeds diverged – with obviously disastrous results. Did the client need a plan C? Perhaps, but at least having a plan B offers greater safety than a single plan A.
Teleconvergence helps our clients decide what they will do when Plan B also fails, as it inevitably will.